This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| cathteam:reid [2008/07/25 08:34] – cathteam | cathteam:reid [2008/07/25 08:38] (current) – cathteam | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Adam Reid ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Me enjoying a traditional Japanese kaiseki meal in a ryokan somewhere outside Kyoto | ||
| + | ===== PhD student ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am currently nearing the end of my PhD and planning to submit by the | ||
| + | end of the year. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Research Interests ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Prediction and utilisation of protein domains for function prediction ==== | ||
| + | My work has involved aspects of the prediction and utilisation of protein domains. | ||
| + | I did some work on using profile-profile methods of remote homology detection to | ||
| + | detect CATH domains and solved some of the problems associated with benchmarking such methods | ||
| + | which have remarkable abilities in predicting very remote homologues (Reid et al, 2007). The | ||
| + | paper describes which methods are best for different uses and at varying degrees of | ||
| + | sequence identity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subsequently I have been involved in an international collaboration, | ||
| + | the ENFIN network to predict protein function (Kahlem & Birney, 2007). This has allowed members of our group | ||
| + | and two other bioinformatics groups to attempt to predict proteins in human which | ||
| + | might be involved in the mitotic spindle. These predictions were tested experimentally | ||
| + | and the bioinformatic methods were shown to drastically increase the success rate in | ||
| + | finding relevant proteins. Our prediction method is called BioMiner. BioMiner is a | ||
| + | protein function predictor which integrates several different approaches. As part of BioMiner | ||
| + | I wrote a program called CODA which | ||
| + | is an update of the gene fusion approach to protein function prediction originally | ||
| + | introduced simultaneously by Edward Marcotte & David Eisenberg and Anton Enright | ||
| + | & Christos Ouzounis in 1999. CODA is geared towards predicting functions in eukaryotes | ||
| + | where gene fusion has traditionally been less reliable. I used a new way of scoring | ||
| + | the results to get the round the problems associated with large eukaryotic genomes | ||
| + | and the method performs very well against others. This work is in submission. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Evolution of protein complexes ==== | ||
| + | My most recent work has involved looking at protein complexes in yeast and E. coli. | ||
| + | I'm interested in how these complexes form in evolution and how they encapsulate | ||
| + | function. Some very interesting papers on this subject include one from Martijn Huynen' | ||
| + | lab (Gabaldon et al, 2005) where they trace the evolution of a large protein complex (NADH: | ||
| + | through the eukaryotes, Gavin et al (2006) which describes an exhaustive TAP assay showing | ||
| + | that complexes are probably composed of constant cores and variable modules and a recent | ||
| + | paper from Sarah Teichmann' | ||
| + | their evolution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Refs | ||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Selected Publications ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | {{pubmed> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Other Interests ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Outside of science I spend my time cooking, playing bass in my band [[http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Other CATH Team Members ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~DIR? | ||
| + | |||